- Kunti and Karna
Kunti’s revelation that Karna is her son raises several moral and ethical issues. Revealing his true identity to Karna just before the war placed an enormous emotional burden on him, creating loyalty conflicts at a critical moment, which can be seen as morally questionable due to the manipulation of his emotions. Informing others after Karna’s death denied him and his brothers the chance to know each other and possibly change the course of the war. Kunti’s long-term secrecy about Karna’s identity can be considered deceptive, as it manipulated the lives of Karna and her other sons, fostering animosity and tragedy. Her actions appear manipulative, aiming to influence Karna’s decisions for strategic gain, raising ethical questions about using personal relationships as tools. The prolonged secrecy resulted in prolonged enmity and devastating consequences, raising concerns about the repercussions of hiding the truth. Kunti’s actions deeply affected relationships, with Karna feeling abandoned, and the Pandavas denied bonding with their elder brother, facing anguish upon learning the truth after his death. Her decisions raise questions about her responsibility and accountability. It highlights the complex moral and ethical dilemmas involving, the timing and manner of revealing the truth, the impact of secrecy and manipulation, and the broader consequences of her choices.
When Satyavati could acknowledge her illegitimate son Vyasa before Bhishma, what prevented Kunti from following suit with the same Bhishma present? Does she repeat with her first-born the treatment meted out to her by her father Shurasena, who gave her away to Kuntibhoja? However, her precarious position in Hastinapura, where she has been accepted despite knowing Pandu was cursed with inability to procreate, could be jeopardized if the child from a pre-marital union was acknowledged. Yet, it does not explain why she does not tell Pandu about Karna when he is lecturing her on different types of sons, including those born out of wedlock, and pressing her to get him surrogate sons.
Kunti’s actions highlight complex moral and ethical dilemmas involving the timing and manner of revealing the truth, the impact of secrecy and manipulation on relationships, and the broader consequences of her decisions. These issues underscore the profound effects that personal choices can have on individuals and their intertwined fates.
- Lac house incident in Varanavat
Kunti’s decision to let the Nishada woman and her five sons die in the lac house in Varanavat raises significant moral and ethical issues. The sacrifice of innocent lives, who had no role in the political conflicts between the Pandavas and the Kauravas, poses serious ethical questions about the value placed on their lives. This act can be seen as a utilitarian approach, where the end of saving her sons justified the means of causing innocent deaths, raising concerns about whether it is ever acceptable to sacrifice a few lives for the perceived greater good. Deceiving Duryodhana through this act involved morally questionable methods and manipulation of circumstances, highlighting the ethical implications of using deceitful tactics, even in the face of danger. Kunti’s lack of accountability for the deaths and her prioritization of her children’s safety over others’ lives is ethically selfish. The devastating impact on the innocent victims’ family and community and the long-term ramifications contributing to the cycle of violence and retribution further complicate the ethical landscape. While some might argue Kunti’s actions were driven by a survival instinct or the extreme measures necessary in the context of war, these justifications do not fully address the ethical implications of sacrificing innocent lives.
- Draupadi’s Polyandry
Draupadi, the daughter of King Drupada of Panchala, held a Swayamvara where she invited suitors to compete for her hand in marriage. The challenge was to string a massive bow and shoot an arrow to pierce a target. Many princes and warriors failed, but Arjuna, disguised as a Brahmin, succeeded and won Draupadi.
Many powerful kings and warriors who had attended the Swayamvara were enraged after a Brahmin won Draupadi by succeeding in the difficult archery contest. They felt insulted and humiliated. A heated confrontation ensued. Some suitors, led by Karna and Shalya, accused Drupada of allowing a Brahmin to take part in the contest, arguing that an unknown individual should not decide such a significant marriage. They were prepared to attack Arjuna and his brothers. When the uproar was at its highest, that foremost of all virtuous men, Yudhishthira, accompanied by those foremost of men, the twins, soon left the arena to return to his lodging. In the ensuing battle, both Arjuna and Bhima defeated all the kings and returned to their hut in the forest with Draupadi. When Bhima and Arjuna arrived with Draupadi at the potter’s hut, their three brothers were already there and must have informed Kunti of the events, wherein Arjuna won the beautiful Princess Panchali. Kunti’s response to Bhima and Arjuna’s announcement—that they should all enjoy what they have brought—is not a casual remark. It is a strategic move in Kunti’s carefully crafted plan to secure the unity and success of her sons from the beginning. Her keen ability to detect potential trouble and act decisively to prevent it is evident, as the five brothers gaze at Draupadi. When Drupad and Dhrishtadyumna objected to the proposal of Kunti, this is what she said. “I fear my words will become as pointless as lies. And if that happens, will I not be tainted with untruth?“She is only concerned about her reputation, showing no regard for the bride Arjuna won. By demanding that she be shared by five brothers, Kunti is condemning the bride to eternal social stigma.
When Pandu, tempted by the desire of having more children, asked his wife Kunti to invoke some other god, she refused, stating that ‘The wise do not sanction a fourth delivery even in a season of distress. The woman having intercourse with four different men is called a Swairini (heanton), while she having intercourse with five becomes a harlot (Prostitute). We recall that Kunti herself has been five-manned by Surya, Pandu, Dharma, Vayu and Indra. The typical mother-in-law, she forces her daughter-in-law into a worse predicament, condemning her to live out her entire life with five husbands, where her own plight was limited to single encounters with five separate persons, none related to the others.
- Kunti’s absence from the Sabha during the dice game.
Kunti’s absence from the Sabha during the dice game, where the Pandavas were invited and Draupadi was publicly humiliated, makes people question her moral and ethical standards. Her lack of presence during this critical event reflects a failure to provide necessary guidance and support to her sons, especially in a situation fraught with severe consequences. As the family matriarch, Kunti had a moral duty to protect Draupadi’s dignity, and her absence suggests neglect of this responsibility, undermining family honour and the well-being of the women in her household. Her absence shows a lack of moral courage to confront and oppose the injustice inflicted upon her family, highlighting an ethical lapse in standing up against wrongdoing. Furthermore, being a key figure in the royal family, her detachment from such a significant political event signals a neglect of her duty towards the kingdom’s governance. Kunti’s inaction not only enabled the continuation of the dice game but also indirectly facilitated the humiliation of Draupadi, raising concerns about the moral responsibility of those who fail to prevent injustice. Her absence may have influenced her sons’ decisions, particularly Yudhishthira’s, underlining the ethical issues related to the influence and responsibilities of elder family members.